The results of the regression analysis showed that according to its beta weights, variables contributing significantly to adolsents’ perceptions of their relations with father were educational level of fathers, elementary school education only, F =.56, p >.452, high school education only, F = 1.19, p >.303, university degree only, F =3.15, p < .025 and conflict resolutions behaviors, F=3.15, p<.025. Stepwise regression analysis was completed in four steps for perceived fathers-adolescents relations. At the end of first three step, fathers' education level accounted for 3 % of the total variance. One way analysis of variance indicated that there was significant differences in perceived fathers-adolescents relations according to the level of fathers education (F = 2,87 p<.023). A posthoc Tukey test was carried out to compare the average of education groups. Mean difference was significant only between adolesents whose fathers' were elementary and high school graduation. Adolesents having fathers' with elementary school graduation perceived more positively their relation with fathers than those with high school graduation (p<.05).When conflict resolution was entered into the equation in Step 4, explained variance of CRS increased from 3 % to 5 %, F = 4.25, p< .002. The educational levels of father accounted for 5 % of the total variance 95 % of the variance was not explained in this analysis.
Brand new in search of recommend that the greater practical beliefs from the matchmaking, individuals have, probably be he’s got conflict solution habits
Inside analysis, it actually was investigated the role away from impaired relationship viewpoints to the both the fresh new perceptions of their relationship on the parents and you can argument quality practices of the late adolescence. Morever, irrational relationhip values notably discussed novel difference away from role in predicting a person’s dispute quality habits. This type of result is actually in keeping with previous search results emphazing the value off individuals’ impaired viewpoints in conflict solution habits (Haferkamp, 1994; Metts Cupach, 1990; Sillars, 1980; Timofiev, 1993)
Which dating ranging from dysfunctional matchmaking viewpoints and disagreement quality routines is actually high level during the Social Rejection buddygays Subscale off ICDS. As well as the values on the interpersonal getting rejected try the most significant predictor from disagreement quality routines, they informed me significant proportion to own variance of conflict solution conclusion. These subscales include values bad attributions of people to people’ behavior and you can services such as for example “people don’t understand myself, people don’t take on me once i in the morning into the a personal environment,” “I will be denied basically let you know my personal feelings and thoughts to people around me personally,” “People don’t continue the promises”. It seems that it finding is actually similar to the attribution concept which emphasizes more negative responses for the partner are likely to take place in the event the personal charged mate attributes otherwise conclusion just like the the main cause of your own problems. And now have, Sillars (1980) discovered that attributions regarding obligations so you’re able to partners for the a regards was seriously associated with the distributive conflict measures.
Furthermore, argument quality routines need a higher level from correspondence that involves self- disclosure, understanding of another. To put it differently, self-confident dispute resolutions choices request a person set aside worry, stress and you can defensiveness (Shi, 2003). In the event that personal believe that being very close to other people within matchmaking explanations having negative consequences such “are sexual with folks constantly produces difficulties”, “It is always useful to continue superficial all of our relationships with folks” and could possibly get enter a relation having fear of rejection as well as could possibly get avoid lead telecommunications and intimate communication and finally could possibly get withdraw of conflict quality.
Also, within the literary works, it had been found that the fresh new correlation between your impaired relationship thinking plus the quality of relationships tended to end up being quite down having the newest non-clinical sample than for health-related group
Contrary the brand new expectation, dysfunctional relationhips viewpoints wasn’t coordinated observed parent-adolescent connections as they are not significant predictor affecting perceived moms and dads-adolescents relations. More over, those with lowest and large impaired thinking did not discriminate in perceieved parent-teenage relationhip. Basically, which impact wasn’t served almost every other studies (Erytiksel, 2003; Erytiksel Aktin, 2003; Vincent-Roehling Robin, 1986) and you will intellectual behavioral family theory and this leaves emphasis on adverse effects from irrational thinking for the nearest and dearest be concerned (Dattilio, 2005; Robin Foster, 1989; Schwebel Okay, 1994; Smith Schwebel, 1995). These types of efficiency is acquired in the caractherictic off ICDS. ICDS measure general dysfunctional viewpoints about social relationship in spite of cognitions regarding parent-adolescent affairs. Next, this new sample is consisted of non-health-related married somebody. (Eidelson Epstein, 1982; Emmelkamp, Krol, Sanderman, Ruphan, 1987).