Bowlby believes that the eating disordered individual dieting just like the she thinks that may perform better relationships which can only help relieve the tensions she don’t handle by herself (Armstrong Roth, 1989)
Possibilities concept and you may target affairs theory coincide regarding examination of restaurants issues. Theorists propose that the latest dynamics of the household members system keep up with the shortage of dealing tips present in food disordered people (Humphrey Stern, 1988).
Humphrey and you will Stern (1988) contend these ego deficits would be the result of numerous disappointments regarding the mommy-kids relationships out of a dining disordered personal
That failure was at the fresh mom’s power to constantly morale new son and manage the girl demands. As opposed to which consistency, the child is not able to build a strong sense of notice and can don’t have any have confidence in the environmental surroundings. Additionally the kid cannot discriminate between a physiological dependence on dinner and you may a difficult otherwise interpersonal need to getting safe (Friedlander Siegel, 1990). Its lack of which safer ecosystem into the child so you can gets her demands found prevents the fresh individuation means of are autonomous and you will declaring intimacy (Friedlander Siegel, 1990). Johnson and you may Flach (1985) unearthed that bulimics understood their loved ones just like the centering on very different end but leisure, intellectual or social. Johnson and you will Flach define you to definitely within these household the newest bulimic have maybe not well enough individuated to assert otherwise display herself when it comes to those elements. These autonomous points as well as disagreement with regards to part just like the “bad guy” or scapegoat.
The fresh dining disordered individual is an excellent scapegoat with the family unit members (Johnson Flach,1985). Mom and dad opportunity their bad selves and their sense of inadequacy toward bulimic and anorexic. This new eating disordered individual provides eg a fear of abandonment you to they’ll meet so it means. As the mothers as well as investment their a selves on the “a good boy”, your family also can understand the dining disordered private as the hero because they sooner or later head the household so you’re able to therapy (Humphrey Strict, 1988).
Group one to care for food issues are usually really dirty also. So it coincides which have Scalf-McIver and you will Thompson’s (1989) discovering that dissatisfaction which have appearance is comparable to a lack away from family unit members cohesion. Humphrey, Apple and you can Kirschenbaum (1986) next establish it disorganization and decreased cohesion as the “repeated entry to negativistic and you can cutting-edge, contradictory telecommunications” (p. 195). Humphrey et al. (1986) unearthed that bulimic-anorexic family was in fact overlooking within affairs hence the brand new spoken blogs of their texts contradicted their nonverbals. Physicians and you will theorists suggest that these types of individuals’ dysfunction is actually relationship to dining for certain explanations. The brand new rejection out-of restaurants or even the purging is actually compared toward rejecting of the mommy and is also a make an effort to get the fresh mom’s attention. Brand new eating disordered private also can prefer to restriction the girl caloric consumption because the she really wants to postpone adolescence because of the woman use up all your out of individuation (Beattie, 1988; Humphrey, 1986; Humphrey Stern, 1988). Binges was a just be sure to complete the emptiness away from a shortage out of internalized nurturance. This new binging is additionally about the fresh new restaurants disordered individual’s inability to choose if they are hungry or need alleviate their mental tensions. Which inability comes from the fresh contradictory awareness of its need because the children. So it care consequences the grade of attachment between mother and child also (Beattie, 1988; Humphrey, 1986; Humphrey Strict, 1988).
The study hasn’t somewhat worried about attachment and separation concepts to explain dinner problems whilst did not look at the theories since the predictive otherwise explanatory. not, Bowlby (given that cited in Armstrong Roth, 1989) shows you to definitely food disordered everyone is insecurely otherwise desperately attached. Predicated on his connection principle, one pulls close to an accessory contour to feel safer and you can soothe its stress coffee meets bagel-coupons and anxiety. It coincides that have Humphrey and you will Stern’s (1988) belief that food disorders means when you look at the varying an approach to alleviate the emotional tension that they’re struggling to reduce by themselves. Other studies have served Bowlby’s theory as well. Becker, Bell and you may Billington (1987) opposed dining disordered and you may low-food disordered somebody with the numerous ego deficits and found you to worry away from shedding a connection profile are the only real pride deficit you to definitely was rather different between them teams. That it once again helps the newest relational nature from eating issues. Possibilities principle and you can target relations principle together with determine as to the reasons this condition happen mainly in women.