Show
We restricted analysis to the three major AAI classifications (Autonomous, Dismissive and Preoccupied) since the examination of unresolved states of mind with respect to attachment, and how these states of mind may be related to later caregiving behaviors and thinking, was beyond the scope of this paper. Replacing the 10 AAI-Unresolved protocols with secondary classifications resulted in 46 parents (59.7%) classified as Autonomous, consistent with the van IJzendoorn and Bakermans-Kranenburg ( 1996 ) norms presented for the AAI (58% base rate). Seventeen parents (22.1%) were classified as Preoccupied and 14 (18.2%) as Dismissive. On the P-CAI, 50 parents were classified as Autonomous (64.9%), 16 as Dismissive (20.8%) and 11 as Preoccupied (14.3%). There were no assignments to the Disorganized category. Classification distributions did not differ for dads, as compared to parents, neither with respect to the AAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(2, 1) = 1.4, p = .49) nor regarding the P-CAI (Likelihood exact ratio G(2, 1) = 2.4, p = .31).
Cross-tabulation of each parent’s attachment (AAI) and caregiving (P-CAI) classifications (Table 2) revealed strong concordance (fathers’ Likelihood exact ratio G(cuatro, 1) = , p< .0001, Kappa = .61, p< .0001; mothers' Likelihood exact ratio G(4, 1) = 25.4, p < .0001, Kappa = .58, p< .0001). Prediction of P-CAI classification from AAI classification resulted in 77.8% exact agreement for fathers, 78% exact agreement for mothers, and 77.9% exact agreement for the entire sample (86% for Autonomous, 72.7% for Preoccupied and 56.2% for Dismissive).
Blogged on the web:
Stepwise logistic regression was performed to your P-CAI classifications dichotomized, insecure (Dismissive/Preoccupied) as opposed to safer (Autonomous). Preliminary investigation to assess possible affects of record details (mother decades, years of knowledge, number of people, ages of notice guy, relational standing) revealed that the new parent’s years of studies was in fact for the this lady/their caregiving symbol category (Wald = 5.21, p = .02), with more several years of knowledge a little reducing the probability of an enthusiastic Autonomous class with regards to adult caregiving. So it variable is regulated for in the next investigation (registered once the 1). To possess prediction from secure caregiving classification (P-CAI/F) we thus registered, from inside the step one, senior friend finder profile numerous years of knowledge together with parent’s possible loving and rejecting feel having father and mother, correspondingly (Desk step 3). The only tall predictor was possible loving enjoy for the mother (Wald = 8.97, p = .003). Rather, years of education made no extreme share on last predictive design. The latest co-parent’s attachment scriptedness (ASA-score), with a high scores exhibiting a coherent malfunction from sensitive and you can receptive parenting, registered in the an additional step notably enhanced prediction off safe caregiving, hence categorized 84.2% of one’s circumstances precisely. Father or mother intercourse, joined in the a third step, generated no sum, showing one moms and dad gender isn’t implicated in, and will not identify this new forecast from, total top-notch caregiving symbolization (P-CAI) (H5). From the last model (Desk 3), likely enjoying knowledge using their moms and dads (AAI) somewhat increased, and probable experience of getting rejected by the dads (AAI) rather quicker, parents’ odds of being categorized since the with Independent caregiving representations.
Penned on line:
To address hypotheses 2–4 concerning links between specific state of mind dimensions of the parent’s caregiving representation and his/her classification with respect to attachment, MANOVA was carried out with P-CAI state of mind subscales as dependent variables: idealization of the child and co-parent, respectively, derogation of the relationship to the child, anger towards the child and co-parent, respectively, parental guilt, and preoccupied feelings of rejection. Parent AAI-classification (Dismissive vs. Preoccupied vs. Autonomous) and gender (mother vs. father) were grouping variables. In addition to the expected main multivariate effect of AAI classification (Wilks’?, F(14, 128) = 7.28, p< .0001, ? 2 = .445), the analysis revealed a multivariate effect of parent gender (Wilks'?, F(7, 64) = 2.65, p = .018, ? 2 = .225), and a multivariate AAI-classification X gender interaction effect (Wilks’?, F(fourteen, 128) = 2.74, p = .001, ? 2 = .231). Among parents with Preoccupied (AAI/E) current attachment representations, there was more preoccupying anger toward the co-parent among mothers, compared to fathers, F(step 1, 71) = 4.88, p = .03, ? 2 = .06 (Mfathers = 2.10, SD = 1.41, Mmothers = 2.37, SD = 1.87) (Figure 1(a)). The multivariate effect of co-parent attachment scriptedness (ASA) as covariate was not statistically significant in this analysis (Wilks’?, F(eight, 64) = 1.87, p = .09, ? 2 = .169), but a univariate effect on parental guilt was found, with more elaborate and readily available attachment scripts in the co-parent predicting lower levels of preoccupying guilt in the parent. Notably, the gender difference in preoccupying anger towards the co-parent was no longer significant.